The effect of cultural structuring on the cultural response of legality among the faculty members of Payame Noor University.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Cultural Sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Cultural Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)

3 Department of Social Sciences, Payame Noor University. Tehran Iran.

Abstract

Legitimacy is the importance that people attach to the law. According to research, its non-acceptance is a social issue in Iran, and considering the cultural diversity in the country, one of the causes of legality can be related to cultural structuring. The research method is descriptive in terms of its purpose, and it is a cross-sectional survey, and to achieve the research objectives, a mixed research method has been used. In the qualitative research method, using the Delphi method, 17 people have been selected as a statistical sample to review sources, documents and interviews. And in the quantitative method, the hypotheses have been examined by developing a questionnaire and the quantitative method of structural equations. The statistical population is all faculty members of Payam Noor University with a sample size of 351 people based on Morgan's table and cluster sampling by covering all ethnicities, the data has been analyzed with Spss and Amos software. The findings of the research show that the level of compliance with legality is the result of the interaction of belief in legality between activists, ethnic groups and the system under the influence of Iranian and local culture. And the non-compliance is the result of the influence of the social system and the strengthening of the law-abiding personality system. The structuring of Islamic culture, the findings show that Islamic action has had an impact on the belief in legality and respect for it, which is related to the theories of Parsons and Piaget. Western action influenced by norms has caused action that is related to the theories of Anderson and Merton. In Iranian structuring, action influenced by resources and belief in legality has an effect on the influence of the system, which is related to the theories of Hirschi and Parsons. and based on local structuring, action influenced by norms and sources and belief in legitimacy is influenced by sources and action is influenced by belief in legitimacy. The effects of the system also cause the creation of law-abiding characters that are related to Briton and Cohen's theories. Be and separate language, in Persian language cultural structure: Iranian and local, in Turkish: local, in Lori and Kurdish: Iranian, Balochi: Islamic, Arabic and Turkmen is also based on the local, Islamic and Western structure of legalization action.

Keywords


  • References:

    • Ashraf, A.(2015).Iranian Identity;From ancient times to the end of Pahlavi, along with two articles by: Gerardo Newly and Shapour Shahbazi.Tehran: Ney.
    • Barzegari, F., & Chahargonbadi, H.(2012).Investigating the level of legislation and factors affecting it in Kerman city.Police Science Quarterly, Year 4, Number 5, 63-77.
    • Behrvan, H., & Behrvan, N.(1390).Sociological causes of risky driving in Mashhad.Journal of Social Security Studies, 28, 109-142.
    • Blau, P. M. (1964). ( Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York.: John Wiley and Sons.
    • Bourdieu, P. &. (1979). The Inheritors: French Students and their Relations to Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. New York: Cambridge University.
    • Pirahari, N.(2019, Spring).Investigating the relationship between cultural and social factors and lawlessness in Semnan city.Social Order, Spring 2019, Volume 12, Number 1, 141-162.
    • Chalabi, A.(2018).Corruption and acceptability of law: From the perspective of legal sociology (Volume 9).Tehran: Nashrani.
    • Chalabi, M.(1375).Sociology of order, Tehran.Tehran: Ney Publishing.
    • Chambliss, W., & Seidman, R. (1971). Law, Order, and Power, Reading, Mass. New York: Addison Wesley.
    • Cohen, A. (1995). Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. New York.
    • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. california: Berkeley University of california Press.
    • Giddens, A. (1989). Sociology.
    • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Standford: Standford University Press.
    • Heydari, A., Rezadoust, K., & Fortunkia, Sh.(2011).The theory of institutional disintegration and lawlessness, a case study: students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.Iranian Social Issues Quarterly, third year, number 2, 39-59.
    • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency, Berkeley and Los Angeles:. University of California.
    • Junger, M., & Haen Marshall, I. (1997). The inter-ethnic generalizability of social control theory: An empirical test. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 79-112.
    • Lawson, T., & Heaton, T. (1990). Crime and Deviance.
    • Longshore, D., Chang, E, Hsieh, S, Hsieh, S., & Messina,, N. (2004). Self-control and social bonds: A combined control perspective on deviance. 542-564.
    • Luo Xin, Q. (2008). On Law-abiding and Religion. Journal of Guanxi youth leaders college, 2, 84-85.
    • Robbington, A., & Martin Weinberg.(1382).Seven theoretical approaches in examining social issues.(R. Sediq Sarostani, translator) Tehran: Soroush.
    • Rafipour, F.(1378).Anomie or social disorder: a research on the potential of anomie in Tehran.Tehran: Soroush Publications.
    • Ritzer, J.(1389).Sociological theories in the contemporary era.(M. Talasi, translator) Tehran: Scientific Publications, 16th edition.
    • Sohanian Haghighi, M., Fuladiyan, M., & Akbari, H.(2018).Comparative analysis of factors affecting lawlessness and lawbreaking in Iranian provinces based on fuzzy logic.Iranian journal of epidemiology, 20th volume, number: 4, 3-32.
    • Seidman, A.(1388).Conflict of votes in sociology.(H. Jalili, translator) Tehran: Nashrani, second edition.
    • Shejaei Zand, A.(1379).Discipline and lawlessness.14, 32-34. Sharbatian, M., Jaranshiri, J., & Omrani, M.(1400, summer).Analysis of the sociological relationship of factors affecting lawlessness studied: 20 to 34-year-old youth in Mashhad.Social Order, Volume 13, Number 2, 81-114.
    • Shlapantukh, and(2015).Social order in Maas society.(A. Sarmi Shahab, translator) Journal of Sociologists, first edition.
    • Sedaghat, K.(1384).Investigating the social and cultural factors affecting the lawlessness and legalism of Tabrizi citizens.Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Isfahan.
    • Alivardinia, A.(1378).A sociological study of the level of lawlessness in Mazandaran.A collection of articles on legalism and public culture.Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance.
    • Fath Elahi, J., & others.(1378).Creating a law-abiding spirit.Proceedings of the Conference on Legalism and Public Culture.Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance.
    • Karimi, F., & Navabakhsh, M.(2017).Law evasion and socio-cultural factors affecting it. Case study: 18-29-year-old youth of Marivan city.Intercultural Studies Quarterly, 36, 97-121.
    • Mann, M. (1983). (1983) Encyclopedia of Sociology. london: Mac Millan Press.
    • Mohseni, R.(2011).Sociological analysis of legalism and solutions for legalism and public order.Journal of Police Order and Security, Spring, Volume 5, Number 1 (17 series), 83-108.
    • Mohseni, M.(1379).Investigating social-cultural awareness, attitudes and behaviors in Iran.Tehran:.Tehran: Secretariat of the Public Culture Council of the country.
    • Moidfar, S.(1379).- Sociological explanation of the priority of individual interests over collective interests in Iran.A collection of articles examining the causes and factors of the priority of collective interests over individual interests, Tehran.
    • Mirzaei, A., Ahmadi, Y., Bokharai, A., & Naibi, H.(2016).Lawlessness and social ties: a case study: Ahvaz city, 2016. Socio-Cultural Research Journal, Humanities and Cultural Studies Research Institute, 8th year, 3rd issue, 31-6.
    • William, J. (1993). Critique of Pure Reason. (V. Polities, Ed., & Meiklejohn, Trans.) London: Everyman's Library.
  • Receive Date: 01 June 2021
  • Revise Date: 20 July 2022
  • Accept Date: 21 July 2022
  • First Publish Date: 30 July 2022