راهبرد اجتماعی فرهنگی

راهبرد اجتماعی فرهنگی

«حکمرانی الگوریتمی و تحول مفهوم حمایت حقوقی از زنان: گذار از مسئولیت فردی به عدالت دیجیتال»

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
دانشیار گروه حقوق، دانشگاه باقرالعلوم (ع)، قم، ایران.
10.22034/scs.2026.584715.1816
چکیده
تحول زیست‌بوم دیجیتال و گسترش حکمرانی الگوریتمی، ساختار سنتی قدرت و الگوهای کلاسیک حمایت حقوقی را با چالش‌های بنیادین مواجه ساخته است. در این میان، زنان به‌عنوان یکی از آسیب‌پذیرترین گروه‌های اجتماعی، با اشکال نوینی از خشونت دیجیتال مواجه‌اند که دیگر صرفاً در قالب رفتار مجرمانه فردی قابل تحلیل نیست، بلکه در بستر معماری پلتفرمی، اقتصاد داده و سازوکارهای الگوریتمی بازتولید می‌شود. پژوهش حاضر با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی و با بهره‌گیری از ادبیات حقوق دیجیتال، حکمرانی پلتفرمی و عدالت جنسیتی، به بررسی چالش‌های حقوق دیجیتال زنان در نظام حقوقی ایران می‌پردازد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که الگوی سنتی عدالت کیفری، به‌دلیل فردمحوری، پسینی ‌بودن و بی‌توجهی به نقش ساختاری پلتفرم‌ها و الگوریتم‌ها، در حمایت مؤثر از زنان در فضای دیجیتال ناکارآمد است. براین‌اساس، پژوهش حاضر الگوی «حکمرانی عدالت‌محور دیجیتال» را پیشنهاد می‌کند که بر مسئولیت پلتفرمی، شفافیت الگوریتمی، عدالت داده‌ای و حمایت پیشگیرانه-ترمیمی استوار است. نوآوری مقاله در آن است که خشونت دیجیتال علیه زنان را نه صرفاً به‌عنوان جرم سایبری، بلکه به‌مثابه بازتاب تحول ساختار قدرت در عصر حکمرانی الگوریتمی تحلیل می‌کند و از رهگذر بازاندیشی در مفهوم مسئولیت، چهارچوبی برای بازطراحی حمایت حقوقی از زنان در فضای دیجیتال ارائه می‌دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Legal Protection of Women Against Digital Violence on Platforms: From Individual Responsibility to Platform Responsibility

نویسنده English

ehsan Rafiei Alavi
Associate Prof. Associate Professor of Law, Faculty of Fiqh and Law, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran.
چکیده English

The transformation of digital ecosystems and the rise of algorithmic governance have fundamentally challenged traditional structures of power and classical models of legal protection. In this context, women, as one of the most vulnerable social groups in digital environments, face new forms of violence that can no longer be understood merely as individual criminal acts; rather, they are reproduced through platform architectures, data economies, and algorithmic systems. This article examines the challenges of women's digital rights within the Iranian legal system through a descriptive-analytical method and by drawing upon the literature of digital law, platform governance, and gender justice. The findings demonstrate that the traditional model of criminal justice, due to its individualistic and reactive nature and its neglect of the structural role of platforms and algorithms, is insufficient for the effective protection of women in digital spaces. Accordingly, the article proposes a model of "digital justice-oriented governance" based on platform responsibility, algorithmic transparency, data justice, and preventive-restorative protection. The novelty of the study lies in reconceptualizing digital violence against women not merely as a cybercrime, but as a manifestation of the transformation of power structures in the age of algorithmic governance. From this perspective, the article seeks to provide a theoretical framework for redesigning legal protection of women in digital spaces through a reconsideration of responsibility in the era of platform power and data-driven governance.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Women's digital rights
algorithmic governance
digital justice
platform responsibility
digital violence
data justice
##Allasvand, F. (2022). A conceptual analysis of criteria of equality and inequality in theories of justice and gender justice. Public Law Studies, 52(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.22059/JPLSQ.2020.289488.2173 [In Persian]##
##Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity Press.##
##Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Harvard University Press.##
##Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford University Press.##
##De Gregorio, G. (2022). Digital constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing rights and powers in the algorithmic society. Cambridge University Press.##
##Draude, C., Hornung, G., & Klumbytė, G. (2022). Data justice and feminist perspectives on digital governance. Springer.##
##eSafety Commissioner. (2025). About technology-facilitated abuse. Australian Government. https://www.esafety.gov.au/key-topics/tech-based-abuse/about-tech-based-family-domestic-sexual-violence##
##European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a single market for digital services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 277, 1–102.##
##Falah-Tafti, F. (2025). Legal responsibility of digital platforms regarding the removal of content related to sanctioned personalities: A case study of General Soleimani. Journal of Islamic Human Rights Studies, 14(2), 63–81. [In Persian]##
##Fararu. (2026). Pashte parde-ye parvande-ye janjali-ye Lorestan: Chegouneh yek kanal-e telegrami be bohrani baraye zanan tabdil shod [Behind the controversial Lorestan case: How a Telegram channel became a crisis for women]. https://fararu.com/fa/news/987839/%D9%. [In Persian]##
##Fayyaz-Bakhsh, N., & Khorgami, Z. (2025). A critical analysis of Schopenhauer’s approaches to the metaphysics of gender with emphasis on Ayatollah Javadi Amoli’s view. Qabasat, 30(117), 171–199. https://doi.org/10.22034/qabasat.2025.732837 [In Persian]##
##Hosseini, S. A., Zandi, M. R., & Tadayon, A. (2023). The necessity of criminalizing cyberbullying in Iranian and American criminal law. Comparative Law, 10(1), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.22096/LAW.2023.553437.2043 [In Persian]##
##Hosseini-Moghaddam, S. H., Ayoubi, S., & Taleqan Ghaffari, M. (2023). Civil liability of online stores in Iranian law and a comparative case study in the European Union. Private Law Research, 12(44), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.22054/JPLR.2023.68651.2690 [In Persian]##
##Khatibzadeh, S. (2025). Determining indicators of persuasive content production in virtual space for women and role models: With an Iranian-Islamic lifestyle approach. The Socio-Cultural Strategy Journal of Rahbord, 14(1), 77–121. https://doi.org/10.22034/scs.2025.443009.1557 [In Persian]##
##Klonick, K. (2018). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1598–1670. https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-131/the-new-governors/
##Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. Basic Books.##
##Miller, G., & Hendrix, J. (2024, October 6). Assessing systemic risk under the Digital Services Act. Tech Policy Press. https://techpolicy.press/assessing-systemic-risk-under-the-digital-services-act/##
##Molla-Ebrahimi, E. (2025). Legal responsibility of social media platforms for automated decisions made by artificial intelligence algorithms: A comparative study in the legal systems of the United States, Europe, and Iran. Media Management Review, 4(3), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.22059/MMR.2025.381742.1108 [In Persian]##
##Navabakhsh, M. (2019). A sociological explanation of the effect of using the global Internet network on social trust among Tehran citizens: A case study of residents of District 2 of Tehran. The Socio-Cultural Strategy Journal of Rahbord, 8(1), 89–115. [In Persian]##
##Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.##
##Norouzi, Z. (2021). Cyber violence against women under national and international laws. Women’s Studies, 12(2), 257–290. [In Persian]##
##Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47). United Nations Human Rights Council.##
##Parliament of Australia. (2021). Online Safety Act 2021 (No. 76, 2021). Federal Register of Legislation.##
##Sharifi, B., & Arjmand, M. (2024). Crimes against women in cyberspace: Challenges, gaps, and legal solutions. Cyber Law Journal, 1(2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.22054/jocl.2035.85063.2123 [In Persian]##
##Shirdel, E., Ebrahimzadeh Asmin, H., & Sheibani, Z. (2025). The impact of social networks on students’ attitudes toward gender justice: A case study of Velayat University of Iranshahr. Research on Deviance and Social Problems, 16, 61–88. [In Persian]##
##Stringhi, E. (2024). The due diligence obligations of the Digital Services Act: A new take on tackling cyber-violence in the EU? International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 38(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2023.2295101##
##UN Women. (2024). Technology-facilitated violence against women and girls: Report of the UN Secretary-General. United Nations.##
##United Kingdom Parliament. (2023). Online Safety Act 2023 (c. 50). The National Archives. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50/contents##
##Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158##
##Zarei, M. H., & Mazinanian, S. (2024). Regulation of freedom of expression in cyberspace: A comparative study in the laws of the United States, the European Union, and Iran. Legal Research Quarterly, 27(3), 61–84. [In Persian]##
##Zoomit. (2026). Pashte parde-ye kanalha-ye zanjire-i-ye telegrami-ye azar-e zanan: Az akhazi-ye ramzarzi ta jazb-e hezaran ozv dar chand daghighe [Behind the chained Telegram channels harassing women: From cryptocurrency extortion to recruiting thousands of members in minutes]. https://www.zoomit.ir/shorts/2745. [In Persian]##
##Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.##
دوره 15، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 60
تابستان 1405
صفحه 109-142

  • تاریخ دریافت 12 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 22 مرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 24 مرداد 1405